Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Philosophy of Mind

Every doctrine and theology that once made up my world view has been shredded to pieces. I have quite a comprehensive list of things that I no longer believe. However, when I’m asked, “What do you believe in?” I come up short. The questioner is essentially asking for my personal definition of God, salvation, and the afterlife. Most often when I’ve attempted to formulate an answer, I can clearly sense the interviewer is not trying to hear me but is readily compiling their rebuttal to any answer that would differ from the “I Am”, as introduced in the book of Exodus. I haven’t developed much of a new belief system based in faith. Truthfully, I’ve enjoyed the break from having to.

I haven’t always been this cavalier. Leaving the traditional view of Christianity behind was a necessary, but fearful, event for me. I am one that feels very uncomfortable with not having black and white answers and defined outlines. I am compelled to feel that I have a solid base on the idea at hand. Wandering out into wide open philosophical spaces takes away that safety net. However, my growing Cognitive Dissonance between sermons and rational thought had grown so intense that I needed to drop it all and accept not knowing.

So, what do I believe in? I’d rather answer it by beginning with an entirely different phrasing: What is my philosophy of mind?

We are all searching for something outside of ourselves. We wish for something greater that we can look to, trust in, be thankful for and possibly repay. Daniel Dennett wrote an essay, with which I completely agree, called Thank Goodness. In this writing he works through a recovery period in his health to which he is truly thankful for the goodness that he has encountered.

The best thing about saying thank goodness in place of thank God is that there really are lots of ways of repaying your debt to goodness—by setting out to create more of it, for the benefit of those to come. Goodness comes in many forms, not just medicine and science. Thank goodness for the music of, say, Randy Newman, which could not exist without all those wonderful pianos and recording studios, to say nothing of the musical contributions of every great composer from Bach through Wagner to Scott Joplin and the Beatles. Thank goodness for fresh drinking water in the tap, and food on our table. Thank goodness for fair elections and truthful journalism. If you want to express your gratitude to goodness, you can plant a tree, feed an orphan, buy books for schoolgirls in the Islamic world, or contribute in thousands of other ways to the manifest improvement of life on this planet now and in the near future.

I once had hopes that a new type of church formation would emerge. I rarely think toward that anymore. It may happen, it may not. I focus more on the goodness of the moment. My drive to “do something for God” has been replaced by “just be kind to people”. Anne Lammott writes it best with her definition of the Law of the Jungle: “Remain calm and share your bananas.”

And as for the piece of the human question that begs, “for what purpose are we here?”, psychologist Carl Jung’s answer is my favorite: As far as we can discern, the sole purpose of human existence is to kindle a light in the darkness of mere being.

4 comments:

Barry said...

If there is a god, the purpose of our existence is easy to define. We exist simply because God wants us to exist.

If there is no god, however, then my thought on the matter is this: there is no ultimate purpose to our existence, but our actions in the here and now give it meaning. In other words, whether our lives have meaning or not depends entirely on how we spend the time we are here.

As the saying goes, we're a long time dead. That being the case, we should make our lives count.

One Voice of Many said...

I agree Barry. There isn't anything I despise more than wasting moments that could be precious and not making every moment count.

Nate said...

Wow, Michelle, you are very close to my thinking and beliefs.

To my thinking, great works are not always necessary to be "in" with God. I have been blog reading today, so I do not remeber where I read it, but "be like the ant." Moving on instinct, doing small things, many, many times. Then something big will be accomplished.

We as americans, are tought to think BIG. If it is not BIG, then it has no meaning. But that struggle, that one small human had to be able to hug that child. Is small, so it has no real meaning, to american thinking. But it has huge meaning to the two of them. That is where I believe God has lead me. To individual dealings. The small ones. Where I am still, (remain calm) and know God. (who will often tell you to share your bananas)

Because in my view, God gave a peace of the Holy Spirit to all humans. That is the instict that guides us. So when we are still/calm, we can listen to that instinct. It will normally tell us to do something good. That is the extent of my religious invovement in the world at the moment, besides comuning with those here.

So for me to not go to church, and just listen to that instinct, is doing more for God than all of those that are following human created crap programs.

My belief in God is all that is necessary for me.

Let me put it simply. I believe God exists. I believe the Holy Spirit is in me, and gives me urges that I perceive as instinct. I follow that instinct.

That is the entirty of my faith. But it is deeply imbedded.

Thanks for taking me there, I have never defined my beliefs until today. But it has been long enough for me now to have the perspective to see it clearly.

One Voice of Many said...

Nate -
I, too, had been putting off defining a little more clearly what my current belief system is. I'm glad you were able to have a brief spot of clarity to re-define as well.